Hearing damage and HAV hands
Hearing and hands are needlessly damaged through lack of knowledge and because the specialist noise and vibration industries are often more concerned with measurement rather than risk reduction. So personnel go deaf as they think PPE works well enough. It doesn’t. We know how to reduce the risk to hearing by >80% at negligible cost, so why doesn't it happen? Re HAVS, far too much resource is spent on placebo monitoring of what you already know, that you still have a problem...
Environmental noise - unnecessary stress
Environmental noise plagues people for months or years when it should be sorted within weeks at a fraction of the expected cost. This creates unnecessary stress, deaths and regulator workload. Why? Partly lack of knowledge, but also because the “environmental noise industry” is generally not fit for purpose as evidenced by regulators reporting that around 90% of reports should be sent back as the quality (particularly re diagnosis and control expertise) is very poor. This must change.
I've been involved in noise and vibration for a long time (founding INVC in 1985) and find the lack of progress in the use of best practices that benefit people and industry frustrating and depressing. That’s why we’ve published technology (including a noise control case study database) on this site, why we innovate, and why we’ve become the leading specialist training organisation. There are best practice ways to reduce noise and HAVS risk, you just have to know what they are. That's our objective, to know exactly what they are and to pass that knowledge on... Peter Wilson, Technical Director.
A client list that includes a who’s who of major public and commercial organisations is a consequence of a very successful track record. Our reputation is built on providing elegant, innovative engineering solutions to problems in addition to, or instead of, traditional palliatives. As a result, regulators use us as the arbiters of best practice to provide more options, a guarantee that you’ll be using current best practice with typical project cost savings of 50% - 110+% (the latter for self-financing projects).
We have made our worldwide best practice noise control database open-source. Search our case studies or email us smartphone data for a free, costed evaluation of the remote control of noise options. Examples include the world's only yoghurt based noise control system (> £100k saved on a £110k project); aerodynamic fan noise control technology (no silencers, around £110k saved in the first year on a £100k quote - efficiency gains made it a highly profitable project); £250,000 saved on noise barriers by developing impact source control techniques - and many more...
Best practice: whatever problem a client has, we make sure they get the best practical advice and solution available anywhere. Where existing best practice has been a hassle or not up to par, we’ve developed new best practices. We enjoy innovating, as in:
Noise and vibration are technical subjects, but, despite current conventions, they don’t have to be academic (we suspect a plot…). As busy professionals don’t have the time (or the inclination) to become specialists, we've made our training pragmatic, effective - and enjoyable, becoming the leading UK provider of noise and HAVS training in the process...
“…made noise measurement and calculations easy and both theoretical and practical sessions were superb… the best course I’ve ever been on.” Sean O’Sullivan : H&S Manager, Harris Ireland
Subscribe for the latest in techniques and best practice
Search our worldwide best practice options
Email us a video from your smartphone for an evaluation of best practice